Would the New York Times (a/k/a the "Gray Lady" in media circles) please make up its mind about the meaning of last night's results? Here is a sample of just a few wildly contradictory statements from today's paper:
INTRODUCTION TO LEAD ARTICLE:
Mrs. Clinton's margin in Pennsylvania was probably not sufficient to alter the basic dynamics of the race
FROM LEAD EDITORIAL:
Mrs. Clinton did not get the big win in Pennsylvania that she needed to challenge the calculus of the Democratic race.
But then:
HEADLINE OF SECOND ARTICLE:
With Clear Victory, She Has Rationale to Fight On